The beauty of music is that one manโs trash is often another manโs treasure. Conjecture and opinion will always be at the heart of music history. What one individual might find grating or boring, another might find delightful and beautiful. The following three records werenโt popular with many and earned lackluster reviews. However, I think thereโs something to love about each of them. Letโs take a look!
โMetal Machine Musicโ by Lou Reed
According to the review aggregate RateYourMusic, Lou Reedโs 1975 album Metal Machine Music scored an average rating of 2.82 out of 5.00. And to this day, itโs one of the most controversial albums out there, and definitely Reedโs most controversial album of his career.
Videos by American Songwriter
So, whatโs the problem with Metal Machine Music? To start, it was a massively radical departure from Lou Reedโs previous sound, both as a soloist and as a member of The Velvet Underground. Itโs a noise album that lacks structured songs and is made up of modulated feedback, noisy guitar effects, and varying tape speeds.
This album was so poorly received that it almost ruined Reedโs career. Some would say it did ruin his career. However, I think itโs a fascinating work of art. Reed was doing noise before noise was a thing among audiophiles on the internet. Itโs not an easy album to get through, donโt get me wrong. But I think if it had been released a few decades later, it would have gotten more respect.
โPin Upsโ by David Bowie
This Bowie record from 1973 has an average score of 2.70 out of 5.00 via RateYourMusic. To be honest, I get why this glam proto-punk record did so poorly. Pin Ups is a collection of cover songs, and Bowie more or less released it to get his label off his back. Despite quite a few negative reviews from critics who thought the covers were subpar, this entry on our list of low-rated albums was a commercial success.
Thereโs something nostalgic about this album that provides a look into Bowieโs mind. He took songs that inspired him as a teen in the 1960s and put his own spin on them. A lot of these covers arenโt great, but the experimental edge of this album is at least interesting enough to get through one thorough listen.
โBjรถrkโ by Bjรถrk
While many think that Debut is Bjรถrkโs debut album, it technically isnโt. One of her earliest albums was a self-titled record released in 1977. And this collection of songs, released under her full name of Bjรถrk Guรฐmundsdรณttir, has a rough rating of 2.54 out of 5.00.
If Bjรถrk started a cult, Iโd probably be a part of it. Iโm one of her biggest fans. So, itโs hard for me to hate this album. A lot of people arenโt fans of how cutesy this collection of cover songs is, but Iโm not sure what they were expecting. Bjรถrk was 12 years old when it was recorded. If anything, itโs a lovely little piece of music history and a peek into the childhood of one of this generationโs most creative artists.
Photo by Andre Csillag/Shutterstock








